Bereavement damage in Austria: when is compensation available?

The death of a close person can cause an independent loss for those left behind. Austrian damages law distinguishes between compensation for exceptionally serious grief and shock damage involving an independent psychological health disorder. Neither term simply covers every understandable reaction to bereavement.

Several facts matter: How close was the relationship? What exactly happened? How serious was the responsible person’s fault? What consequences followed for the claimant? Claims of the deceased person, dependency and funeral losses under section 1327 ABGB, and the relatives’ own claims must be recorded separately.

Section 1295 ABGB provides the general basis for damages. If the claimant suffers an independent health injury, section 1325 ABGB may apply. Bereavement compensation and shock damage nevertheless have different requirements. The guidance on pain compensation and consequential loss helps separate the possible consequences.

Bereavement compensation concerns exceptionally severe emotional suffering caused by the loss of a close person. Austrian case law can recognise a claim even without a medically diagnosed psychological illness. The requirements are strict and depend in particular on the seriousness of the fault.

Shock damage, by contrast, requires an independent health disorder amounting to an illness. This can include post-traumatic stress disorder or depression. The focus is then not only grief, but an injury to health within the meaning of section 1325 ABGB. The article on shock damage of close relatives explains the distinction in more detail.

Both directions can arise from the same life event. The same consequence must not be counted twice, however. Symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, grief and financial disadvantages should therefore be documented separately.

The starting point is an exceptional emotional impairment. Ordinary grief after the death of a relative is generally not enough. The suffering must clearly exceed what people normally experience after a serious loss. A fixed diagnosis is not necessarily required, but concrete facts about the intensity and development of the suffering are.

The personal relationship with the deceased must also have been particularly close. Typical family relationships can provide an important starting point. The actual connection remains decisive: shared living, daily support, special care arrangements or an intensive partnership can show the closeness.

The loss must finally be attributable to conduct for which the responsible person is liable. The death must result from an act or omission that creates responsibility. Traffic accidents, medical errors and breaches of duties of care require separate examination of their legal basis and evidence.

Bereavement compensation without an independent health disorder is not available for every form of negligence. The case law generally sets a particularly high threshold. Intentional conduct or gross negligence may provide the required basis, while ordinary negligence alone does not automatically suffice.

Gross negligence is more than an ordinary mistake. It involves an obvious and unusually serious disregard of the required care. Whether that threshold is met depends on the sequence of events, foreseeable dangers, protective duties and the circumstances of the individual case.

Calling conduct grossly negligent in an initial letter does not prove the degree of fault. Preserve the underlying facts: warnings, known risks, speed, protective measures, instructions, checks and reactions to recognisable dangers. The legal assessment must be developed from those facts.

The relationship should not be described only with a family label. Documents and witness accounts about a shared household, care, regular contact, shared obligations and the person’s concrete role in everyday life can help. For life partners or more distant relatives, the actual shared life may be especially important.

Medical records can help show the extent of grief even where there is no illness amounting to a health disorder. Notes about the immediate reaction, psychological support, temporary limits in daily life and statements from close people can make the development understandable. The aim is not to dramatise grief, but to describe it accurately.

Separate evidence by topic: the event, liability, relationship, emotional consequences and financial loss. The damage documents checklist helps arrange records by person and head of loss.

Personal grief is not the same as the financial consequences of a death. Section 1327 ABGB can, subject to its requirements, cover lost dependency and funeral costs. These heads of loss have a different basis and require their own calculations and evidence.

The deceased person may also have acquired claims before death. If there was an earlier injury, these can include treatment costs or compensation for pain. Whether and to what extent such claims pass to successors depends on the course of events and the succession position.

An accident can also involve several responsible persons or insurers. Liability, contributory fault, individual heads of loss and limitation should be recorded in one chronology. The claim assessment tool helps structure the persons involved and the types of claim.

Section 1489 ABGB is generally relevant to limitation of damages claims. Knowledge of the loss and the person liable can be important. After a death, some facts may be clear quickly, while responsibility, the extent of loss or an independent health disorder may become clear only later.

Keep the records early and date conversations with insurers, hospitals, authorities and other participants. Demands, acknowledgements and settlement discussions can matter for the assessment. Limitation should not be assessed only from the date of death.

For an initial legal assessment, prepare a short chronology: event, death, relationship, own reactions, treatment, demands and responses. The guidance on evidence, negotiation and limitation explains how to organise these steps.

Receive new articles and legal information from the firm with BRANDaktuellen Rechtsnews. Subscribe to the newsletter.